![]() ![]() Regardless of which camp you reside in, the next set of questions should be rather obvious: Where does the league go from here? Will this change anything? Would Peel have even gotten in trouble had he not been caught on a live mic? (I think we can all probably answer that last one.)Īgain, "game management" has long been accepted as part of hockey. Others will say that it's an adequate response that to the situation and the league's statement could serve as a warning shot to other officials who may find themselves in a similar set of circumstances moving forward. Some will view Peel's dismissal as the league feigning a moral stance while guiding him out the door slightly earlier than expected. ![]() Just that he won't work any additional games. No where in the NHL's statement does it say that Peel was "fired" or "terminated" or anything of the like. Peel, 53, was set to retire from officiating at the end of this season anyway, so his dismissal only expedites his departure about a month early. Once again, every game is the same.While this seems like a surprisingly strong (though entirely appropriate) action from a league that doesn't often hold officials accountable in a public forum, it can also be argued that it's not quite as harsh as it appears on the surface. I don't think you should go into the game with a bias towards a certain player. "A penalty is a penalty to me, whether it's in the first period, second, overtime, playoff game, regular season, preseason game," May said. "I think there has to be consistency in this and that every game should be refed the exact same according to how that referee calls his penalties. There should be no such thing as "make-up calls." Each game should be treated the same regardless of whether it's a regular season game or a Stanley Cup matchup. What both May and Laughlin agreed on is that whether a penalty is called or not should have nothing to do with any outside circumstances. "Tim Peel would've been better served, he, unfortunately, got caught in the hot mic, allow me and Joe and and the analysts around the league say, 'that was a make-up call,'" Laughlin said. Laughlin, who played for the Capitals for six seasons and has served as an analyst for over three decades, made a noteworthy point that it's the analyst's job to say whether a referee made the right call or not, rather than the refs. It comes down to the integrity of the league and they made the right decision, unfortunately," Laughlin said. But I don't know exactly what he said."Ĭapitals looking to keep goalie pipeline going with Gibson, Keller I've trashed him on Twitter, I've trashed him on the show. I've been very hard on Peel over the years. "It looks really bad for the National Hockey League," May said on Capitals Pregame Live. "I feel really bad for Tim Peel because we didn't get to hear his entire conversation. "There wasn't much, but I wanted to get a penalty against Nashville early in the-," Peel said after calling a tripping penalty on Predators forward Viktor Arvidsson.Īhead of the Capitals contest Thursday night against the New Jersey Devils, NBC Sports Washington's Alan May and Craig Laughlin gave their take on whether the NHL made the right call with the firing of Peel.įor May, he believes firing Peel - an NHL referee for several years - was a bad look for the league, as the hot mic clip only caught a snippet of Peel's entire comment. The National Hockey League cracked down hard on Tim Peel on Wednesday, firing the longtime referee and banning him from officiating future games after he was caught on a hot mic during Tuesday's Nashville-Detroit matchup saying he wished he granted a penalty on the Predators earlier in the game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |